BFH: Inspection authority of the customs administration under the Minimum Wage Act towards foreign employers

Employers based in another EU member state whose employees work in Germany are obliged under the Minimum Wage Act (MiLoG) to tolerate an audit by the customs administration of the type and scope of work performed in Germany.

Decision of the Federal Fiscal Court (Bundesfinanzhof, BFH) with three judgements dated 18 August 2020 – VII R 34/18, VII R 35/18 and VII R 12/19.

In the mentioned cases, foreign transport companies had submitted declarations in accordance with the Minimum Wage Reporting Ordinance and had carried out so-called cross-border transports. In these cross-border transports, either only the unloading or only the loading took place in Germany. In some cases, it was disputed between the parties whether such transports had taken place at all or whether the drivers of the foreign transport company had not merely been engaged in so-called transit transport, i.e. had only passed through Germany.

In order to clarify these cases, the main customs office issued audit orders with reference to the MiLoG and requested the employers to submit employment contracts, pay slips and working time records, etc. The foreign employers filed a complaint against this. The foreign employers filed a complaint against this. They argued that the MiLoG was not applicable to foreign transport companies. In addition, they argued that it violated the federal system of competences, the constitutional requirement of certainty and EU law because of the customs authorities’ audit powers. The appeals were unsuccessful.

The BFH has now rejected the applicants’ appeals as unfounded and ruled that the disputed audit orders and the associated requests for the submission of documents were lawful. In particular, it had been permissible under Article 87(3) sentence 2 of the Basic Law for the federal legislature to confer powers on the customs administration to verify an employer’s compliance with its obligations under section 20 of the MiLoG. On the other hand, the disputed question of whether short-term employment was covered by the MiLoG at all was irrelevant, because irrespective of this problem, the customs authorities had to be able to determine in the first place to what extent the workers concerned were or had been actually employed in Germany.

Related Posts

Internationale Arbeitsverträge und Entsendeverträge – Beratung von IAC

Minimum wage increased to € 10,45 by 1 July 2022

On 01.07.2022, the statutory minimum wage was raised from € 9,82 to € 10,45 gross/hour. Minimal wage jobs up to 450 euros per month are also covered by the Minimum Wage Act (MiLoG). They are...
IAC International Assignment Consulting

Cross-border temporary agency work: ECJ concretises the criterion of usual activity

Due to generally much lower tax rates than in Western European countries, temporary workers (especially from Eastern European countries) are covered by social security in the country of establishment of the temporary employment agency and...

Latest blogs on global assignments

USA: Abolition of entry stamps in passports
14. November 2022
USA entry: Restriction for ESTA travelers
18. October 2022
The IAC Dressage Cup
18. October 2022
US Visa: Shorter waiting times at U.S. consulates
5. October 2022
EU – Suspension of visa agreement with Russia
4. October 2022
IAC supports youth development in handball
13. September 2022

Get the latest information on "International Personnel Management - assignments worldwide".